A
review of “Carrie”, released in October 2013 and published on Scannain.com
“Carrie” is going to suffer
hugely from comparisons with Brian De Palma’s 1979 masterpiece, that’s
inevitable. Directorially, ”Carrie” is almost shot-for-shot an homage to Brian
De Palma’s 1979 original, which I promised myself I wouldn’t mention. Kimberly
Peirce has taken an “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” attitude to directing –
she offers very little new in terms of direction, with the exception of a few
half-assed references to modern technology. It’s technically great – the CGI
levitation is fun and the climactic gymnasium scene brings the blood, just as
the audience wants it. What makes this reboot different to its predecessor is
the two central characters, Margaret and Carrie White, and how they are
portrayed on screen. By choosing two
strong actresses for these roles, Peirce saves “Carrie” from becoming a
floundering, boring mess of a film.
Chloe Moretz has long been
an actress to watch and she does a fine job balancing Carrie White’s social
awkwardness with her superpower-esque discovery of her powers. Less spaced out
than Sissy Spacek’s performance, Moretz’ Carrie is a clever if naïve girl who
doesn’t meet her mother’s abuse with cowardice but knowledge. There’s a very
interesting take on the scene where Margeret reads the bible to Carrie – she
pushes her away, yelling “that’s not in the Bible, Momma!” By making Carrie
clever, we give her a little more spine and the audience feels much more
sympathetic for her throughout. She’s less submissive, less pathetic; when she
brings hell down on her Prom, we’re almost rooting for her. The main criticism
of Moretz is that she’s simply too cute to play Carrie – for a start, she looks
about five years younger than her made up, short skirted peers. This makes the
bullying all the more horrifying – Carrie looks like a little girl, and an absolutely
adorable one. The classic image of a creepy-looking Sissy Spacek is totally
refuted by the wide-eyed, curly haired Moretz. Her homemade clothes look hip –
Carrie looks like the girl you want to be friends with, not the girl who’s
horribly bullied. Where is Carrie’s John Bender? She looks as though she’d be
scooped up by the hipsters as soon as she could say “Oh, telekinesis? You’ve probably
never heard of it.”
Julianne Moore is suitably
crazed and religious as overbearing mother Margaret. Being both abusive and
loving is a hard line for an actor to walk, and though Moore’s performance
feels over the top at times, it’s ultimately what the role calls for. While Margaret White is often portrayed as
evil, Moore’s performance suggests a more mentally ill woman - what could be a
sad reality. Similarly to Moretz’ clever Carrie, Moore’s mentally unstable Margaret
is undoubtedly a horrible figure, but also one that inspires an odd sort of
sympathy. It’s unfortunate for “Carrie”
that the rest of the cast feel as though they are going through the motions –
Portia Doubleday is over-evil in her role as Chris, and Judy Greer just can’t
shake Kitty from Arrested Development for me. Carrie is, essentially, about
those two central characters – but it’s a shame the two solid central
performances are matched against poor supporting ones.
My main problem with
“Carrie” was simply that it’s a film that, like it’s central character, doesn’t
quite fit in. It’s scary at times, but not scary enough to even consider
alongside the utterly terrifying 1979 version. It feels like a teen movie at
times – graduation, prom, the cute boys and the sinister YouTube clips – but
the blood-soaked final third puts paid to that. “Carrie” doesn’t quite succeed
in mixing genres the way it wants to, which makes it much harder to enjoy.
During the scenes when Carrie lets her telekinesis loose on the town, even
Moretz looks slightly confused by proceedings, staring at her hands in a weird
mixture of bewilderment and rage. That’s not quite what I felt after watching,
but “Carrie” could have been so much better. A little streamlining of the
subject matter and more focus on genre would have gone a long way with this
one. That said, “Carrie” never tried to be Oscar bait and it’s an immensely
enjoyable film – not too scary, not to cheesey and with stellar lead
performances.
No comments:
Post a Comment