Friday, June 28, 2013

You're doing it wrong: sex negative/positive/neutral feminism and me.

I don't know if it's just my addled brain or the week that's been in it, but it seems that feminism is everywhere lately. I can't log into Facebook, Twitter or Tumblr without being bombarded with images, articles and news reports on feminist issues, be it Youth Defence's awful stunt yesterday, Wendy Davis' heroics in Texas or something as simple as a lad mag issue. Is it just me or is the idea of feminism hotting up again? Brilliant, I crow! I welcome you all to the feminist party! Take off your shoes and have some wine. This is, after all, one of the most inclusive movements out there, right?

Or not.

I get that feminism is divided into lots of different factions, because it has to be. "Just as there is no one woman, there can be no one feminism", if you will. (I didn't say that - it was a quote I came across studying for my exams but it's a brilliant one) I'm cool with these factions - I don't have the same feminism needs as someone who is LGBT, or from another country - but when I read this article earlier today I couldn't help wondering just what these "feminists" were getting at. The article interviewed two "radical feminists", who go on to question consent and sex positive feminism. In an article that begins with "how two young feminists are using radical feminism to change the world", certain elements of the article seem just a little backward. It's no doubt an interesting read, but nonethless, parts of it rubbed me up the wrong way - so rather than tear the article apart (which, let's face it, I'm not clever enough to do) I'm just going to offer my two cents on bits and pieces of "radical" feminism that have bothered me for a while now.

First of all: yeah, we live in a hyper-sexualised society. The recent outrage at Kraft's at for Philidelphia shows that the hyper-sexualisation doesn't exactly go both ways: by and large, it's women who are presented as sex objects, not men. Things like capitalism are intertwined with this issue and that's a bloody problem. The portrayal of women in the media is one of those things I can't talk about without choking on my own-rage tears, unable to construct a proper argument. It's something that angers me to the point of incoherency. While I do see that society's ideals of women need to change, I don't think "sex negativity" is the way to do it.

A small history lesson: "sex-negative" feminism sprang up in the 1970's when a bunch of women decided porn was wrong. Fair enough. But it's other elements of it I dislike - Andrea Dworkin, for example, wrote a book (that I ought to read) called Intercourse, which kind of kicked off the sex-negative movement.

"Intercourse is the pure, sterile, formal expression of men's contempt for women," - from "Intercourse"


From ideas like this, the idea of "consent" arises. Consent is important: durr. But some feminists would argue that consent is meaningless in a patriarchal society, which to me, sounds like undermining women in a huge way. From what I can gather from SNF, it seems to be arguing that sex is...well, bad  for women. I think the TC quote was said in quite general terms, but it's still a dangerous thing to say . It's here my own life philosophy comes in: not your body? Not your problem. Consent is a thing between two people - yes, it's violated sometimes and that's horrific but I don't think that it's constantly undermined by the patriarchy. I try to keep the patriarchy out of my knickers in so far as possible.


" Even the notion of consent, considered by so many to be a simple matter, is problematic — in a patriarchal society where women’s agency is circumscribed by male supremacy, how meaningful is consent? These issues are purposefully obscured by sex-positive feminists who believe that sex is an inherent good and that to feel otherwise is somehow aberrant, abnormal, a position that should be remedied." - from Thought Catalog's interview 

However, my real problem with sex-negative feminism is how problematic it is to an young Irish woman such as myself. It's adding to the double-standard that women have regarding sex. I'm not pretending to be an expert on anything in this area - I'm nineteen, for Christ's sake, and I've only identified as a feminist for about two years! Nonetheless, however, this idea makes me uncomfortable. Not only are Irish women dealing with slut-shaming, vague Catholic guilt and all those general worries about having sex, we're dealing with dissention from a movement that's supposed to be inclusive and safe for women. I'm beginning to view the anti-sex brigade as akin to the anti-choice brigade - I believe that the option to  have sex should be there. Or to not have sex. No one will judge you for either choice, because guess what?

  • What you do with your body is no one's problem but your own
The notion that sex is anti-feminist and anti-women is bullshit. Sex is not in a vacuum; of course it's influenced by what goes on around us. But that doesn't mean it's up to someone with different beliefs to tell you what/what not to do. I'm not allowing rape by having sex. I'm not allowing the patriarchy to exist. If anything, by being open about sex and not allowing slut-shaming to happen around me, I'm helping (in a tiny, pathetic way) to dismantle it. From what i've seen, sex-negative feminism implies that women who have sex with men are somehow letting the side down. The whole thing smacks of keeping women down and conforming to someone else's standards - isn't that what feminism is trying to get rid of?

I've said it before and I'll say it again: I'm no expert. There's a lot of elements to Radical Feminism that I do not understand. But just a quick scroll through Tumblr's sex negative tag brings up some pretty worrying stuff.

In essence, I still feel that women's sexualities are trodden down - by both men and other women - on a day to day basis in various ways. It's being called a slut, posts on Facebook about how women should keep their legs closed, being told that hair isn't sexy, Youth Defence, hundreds of ads, airbrushing, having things shouted at you in the street, being told to stop talking about sex or the worst, scariest parts things - it's there, it's happening on a daily basis, and it's terrifying.  I am standing on a stool and shouting "I reject this!" because my sex life - and on that note, my body, my sexuality and my feelings - are not your problem. Just as yours isn't my problem.

Stop telling me what to do with my body, guys, you're acting like the patriarchy.

2 comments:

  1. http://radtransfem.wordpress.com/2012/02/29/the-ethical-prude-imagining-an-authentic-sex-negative-feminism/

    http://radtransfem.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/under-duress-agency-power-and-consent-part-one-no/

    There is a wrong understanding of ''purity culture''. It's not that the woman is not allowed to have sex it's the contrary! Sex is an obligation for her and sex is a service for men. Men do have a sexual entitlement which trumps female desires and boundaries! So how men can live out their sexual entitlements when the woman is not sexually available?
    http://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2012/09/the-purity-culture-and-sex-as-a-duty.html

    ''"Intercourse is the pure, sterile, formal expression of men's contempt for women," - from "Intercourse"''
    I'm sorry but that's kind of true! It's not that sex-negative feminists think that sex is inherently an hostile expression against women but, yes men have instrumentalised sex or better penetration as a symbole of vanquish, defeat and humiliation. Look at our language of sex. ''Suck a dick'' -> male language for insult, humiliation; fuck as a synonym for sex (or better penetration) but also a synonym for destruction and humiliation (fuck patriachy, fuck slut shaming, life is fucking me etc). This is not a coincidence because you can find that actually in every language. A vulgar word for sex but not just for ''sex'' but actually for penetration and thrusting while at the same time a synonym for insult, destruction and humiliation. To say that the male sexuality and sex is not weaponized against women, I'm sorry but that's ignoring reality. Men do use sex against women and they usually enjoying it. Because it gives them a sense of sexual superiority (while usually feeling sexually dominated by women because of their sexual dependency) and it's also a source of sexual arousal by itself. Men who are watching pornography for example, need more sexualized violence and hostility against women in order to become sexually aroused in the first place, watching how two people have sex is not enough arousing for them.
    It doesn't mean that you can't have positive sexual experiences as a woman, of course you can. But it's complicated in patriachy, where sexuality is extremly andro- and phallo-centric and the woman is perceived as a sexual service-object. Sex-positive feminism is an individualized movement. Sex-negative feminism is not individualizing sex and examines what sex means on a social level. So me for example, I am sex-negative on a social level because of the sociocultural misogynistic meaning of sex as well because of the weaponization of the male sexuality and sex against women but on a personal or individual level I'm sex positive and don't feel ashamed for my female sexuality. Sex-negative feminism has absolutely nothing to do with shaming sexuality for itself but criticising its patriachal social and psychological perception and usage. Sexuality is not just something what you have got but also what you use/share. And HOW are you using it?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Ella!
    Your comment is really interesting - I'm not sure if it came across in my post, but I don't know a whole lot about sex negative feminism so your comment was hella helpful. I'm not sure I agree with some of your arguments - from what I've read (granted, on tumblr, which is perhaps not the sanest place to read about things like feminism) a lot of it seems a little bit shamey. However, that doesn't mean I can't take some of your points on board - I agree with your outlook on sex on a social level, at least! Thanks for commenting :)

    ReplyDelete